Παρασκευή 20 Ιανουαρίου 2012

Tamiflu's Effectiveness Remains Uncertain - Roche Still Not Releasing Vital Trial Data

Editor's Choice
Main Category: Flu / Cold / SARS
Also Included In: Swine Flu;  Respiratory / Asthma
Article Date: 18 Jan 2012 - 10:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

not yet ratednot yet rated
Two years ago, pharmaceutical giant, Roche, promised the BMJ to release key Tamiflu trial data for an independent investigation. However, Roche refuses to provide full access to all its data. According to a new report by the Cochrane Collaboration, Roche's refusal to provide access leaves critical concerns about how the drug works unresolved.

A BMJ investigation, published at the same time as the report, also voices serious concerns regarding drug data access, the drug approval process and the use of ghostwriters in drug trials.

Because Tamiflu has become a common influenza treatment in the UK, with the World Health Organization also adding the drug onto their list of Essential Medicines, Roche continues to declare that it is supported by influential health agencies.

When Cochrane researchers decided to investigate into Roche's claim that Tamiflu prevented complications and reduced the number of people in need of hospitalization, they found their investigation to be jeopardized by Roche's refusal to provide all of its trial data for analysis. They managed to obtain some clinical study reports from the European Medicines Agency (EMA), but discovered that these were inconsistent with published reports and potentially under-reported the drug's side effects. The BMJ questioned Roche earlier, with Roche admitting that some of its published papers had been written by ghostwriters.

The BMJ study shows how various regulators applied different approaches to the data that was submitted to them, which lead to conflicting messages in terms of the drug's effectiveness, for example, even though Cochrane obtained a proportion of Tamiflu's clinical study reports of the trials from the EMA, it admits not asking for the remainder from the manufacturer despite being legally entitled to do so. Since then, the EMA has informed the BMJ of its plans to start publishing reports for all drugs submitted for approval within the next few years.

Dr Fiona Godlee, BMJ Editor-in-Chief declared: "We hope very much that the EMA will indeed take this important step in making the full study reports available. But we are still a long way away from having a full trial history for all drugs in clinical use. Public safety and the proper use of public money demands that we should stop at nothing less than this."

In the meantime, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), decided not to review the largest ever trial of Tamiflu during its drug approval process, even though it reviewed the Tamiflu trial program in probably more detail than anyone outside of Roche. The FDA declares that, "Tamiflu has not been shown to prevent such complications [serious bacterial infections]." In contrast, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) carries on quoting key published trials of Tamiflu that declare the drug has a lower risk of influenza complications, even after Roche's confession of using ghostwriters for some of these trials.

Dr Godlee warns: "The discrepancies between the conclusions reached by different regulators around the world highlights the absurd situation we find ourselves in. In a globalized world, regulators should cooperate and pool their limited resources. Otherwise we will continue to waste money and risk people's health on drugs that don't work."

The investigation has also brought questions about Tamiflu's clinical effects into light. The Cochrane researchers state that after a thorough assessment of trial data Tamiflu seems to affect the production of antibodies, a statement that Roche refutes. The team highlights the importance given that influenza vaccination relies on antibody response to be effective, however when the BMJ questioned Roche, they refused to explain how the drug operates. The Cochrane researchers therefore comment that "until more is known about the mode of action of neuraminidase inhibitors, health professionals, patients and other decision makers need to reflect on the findings of this review before making any decision about the use of the drug."

Cochrane also disputes claims of Tamiflu's ability to prevent influenza from spreading, as it has not been proven in trials, however this is one of the main reasons why governments worldwide have spent billions of dollars to stockpile Tamiflu in case of a pandemic.

Roche claims that they have provided the Cochrane team with sufficient information to carry out their investigation, yet according to the Cochrane team this is untrue.

Dr Peter Doshi from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine declares: "In the BMJ in December 2009, Roche promised full study reports to any legitimate investigators. They have not provided a single full study report to Cochrane, despite our repeated requests."

Written by: Petra Rattue


Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today Visit our flu / cold / sars section for the latest news on this subject. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Petra Rattue. "Tamiflu's Effectiveness Remains Uncertain - Roche Still Not Releasing Vital Trial Data." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 18 Jan. 2012. Web.
18 Jan. 2012. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Rate this article:
(Hover over the stars then click to rate)

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

FDA Approves Voraxaze To Treat Patients With Chemotherapy Toxicity

Editor's Choice
Main Category: Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 17 Jan 2012 - 17:00 PST
email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
4 starsnot yet rated
Voraxaze is an enzyme that rapidly breaks down the chemotherapy drug methotrexate to a byproduct that the body can more easily eliminate. Voraxaze is given intravenously.
Methotrexate was developed in the 1950s as a chemotherapy and is used either alone or in combination with other drugs. It is effective for the treatment of a number of cancers including: breast, head and neck, leukemia, lymphoma, lung, osteosarcoma, bladder, and trophoblastic neoplasms. It is also used for autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, lupus and Crohn's disease, as well as for treating ectopic pregnancy and for inducing medical abortions.
Richard Pazdur, M.D., director of the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products in the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research said :
"Prolonged exposure to high levels of methotrexate can result in kidney and liver damage, severe mouth sores, damage to the lining of the intestine, skin rashes, and death due to low blood counts ... Voraxaze is an important new treatment option for cancer patients aimed at preventing these toxicities associated with sustained high levels of methotrexate."
22 patients were added to a single clinical trial aiming to evaluate the effectiveness of Voraxaze. All the patients received Voraxaze treatment and the study considered treatment a success if the methotrexate level fell below a critical level within 15 minutes and stayed below the critical level for eight days. Ten of the 22 patients achieved this standard. Although not all patients experienced the highest results, Voraxaze eliminated 95 percent of the methotrexate in all patients. A separate trial of 290 patients analyzed problems of clearing the drug from the bloodsteam
Patients did complain of some side effects including : low blood pressure (hypotension), headache, nausea, vomiting, flushing, and abnormal sensation (paraesthesia) which were experienced by around one percent of test subjects.
Written by Rupert Shepherd
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
Visit our cancer / oncology section for the latest news on this subject. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:
MLA

n.p. "FDA Approves Voraxaze To Treat Patients With Chemotherapy Toxicity." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 17 Jan. 2012. Web.
18 Jan. 2012. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.

Rate this article:
(Hover over the stars then click to rate) Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


View the original article here

Πέμπτη 19 Ιανουαρίου 2012

Vitamin D Doesn't Help Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: COPD
Article Date: 18 Jan 2012 - 9:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

not yet ratednot yet rated
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterized by diseases such as Bronchitis and Emphysema, where breathing becomes more difficult as the airways are inflamed, blocked with mucus and ultimately permanently damaged. The problem is usually caused by cigarette smoking, although exposure to industrial chemicals, pollutants or smoke inhalation may also be involved.

It was thought that vitamin D might be effective in helping to ease the condition, because most patients with COPD have vitamin D deficiency, but new research published in Annals of Internal Medicine suggests otherwise.

The study was carried out by scientists at The University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and funded by Applied Biomedical Research Program, Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology. Wim Janssens, MD, PhD, of University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium, and colleagues gave test subjects monthly doses of 100,000 IU or more than 3,200 IU per day, where the standard recommended dose is only 600 IU daily to 800 IU daily for lactating women and the elderly. However no marked change or improvement was seen in the patients' symptoms.

In total, 182 patients were part of the trial and all had moderate to severe COPD and recent history of exacerbations. The primary outcome was time to first exacerbation. Secondary outcomes were exacerbation rate, time to first hospitalization, time to second exacerbation, quality of life, and death.

Patients' vitamin D level was measured by blood test throughout the trial, and patients were given either 100,000UI of vitamin D per month for a year, or a placebo. The researchers then recorded whether patients had exacerbations of COPD during the study.

Although patients receiving the supplements of vitamin D showed increased levels in their blood, the number of exacerbations over the course of the year was no different to those on the placebo. Researchers did note that a small group of patients that started the trial with extremely low vitamin D levels may have showed some improvement, but results were inconclusive.

They recommended a further research to investigate whether patients with very low vitamin D levels may benefit from supplements, but so far it appears in general that most patients won't benefit greatly, if at all, and certainly Vitamin D supplements are not an effective way to prevent exacerbation of COPD.

Dr. Wim Janssens, from the respiratory division at University Hospital Gasthuisberg in Leuven, the lead investigator said :

"There are studies showing that patients with vitamin D deficiency are more susceptible to different inflammatory, infectious and autoimmune diseases, and most likely COPD ... [however] ... Vitamin D restoration to normal levels in COPD patients does not reduce the number of exacerbations, does not reduce the infections and inflammation."

Written by Rupert Shepherd
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our copd section for the latest news on this subject. There are no references listed for this article. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Rupert Shepherd B.Sc. "Vitamin D Doesn't Help Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 18 Jan. 2012. Web.
18 Jan. 2012. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Rate this article:
(Hover over the stars then click to rate)

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

UK Government's NHS Reforms - Anyone Understand Them? Professor Asks

Editor's Choice
Main Category: Public Health
Article Date: 18 Jan 2012 - 10:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

not yet ratednot yet rated
Even though Professor Martin McKee, from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, has 25 years of experience in researching health systems, including writing more than 30 books and 500 academic papers, he states in a personal view published on bmj.com today that he still does not understand the government's plan for the NHS, saying: "I have tried very hard, as have some of my cleverer colleagues, but no matter how hard we try, we always end up concluding that the bill means something quite different from what the secretary of state says it does."

According to McKee, even Malcolm Grant, the incoming chairman of the National Commissioning Board, has expressed that the bill is "completely unintelligible."

Professor McKee teaches a course on health systems every year, knowing that his students will also expect him to explain the changes proposed by the Department of Health in England this year. He writes:

"If I am to do so, I need to understand them first.
Here lies the problem."

He states that his first problem lies in understanding what the changes are trying to solve. Whilst the government claims that a reform is needed due to the NHS's poor performance in international terms, the evidence it has produced has been completely discredited. For example, in regard to mortality rates caused by heart attacks, independent studies have demonstrated that the UK is now improving at a more rapid rate than nearly any other country. In addition, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has claimed that the UK would have performed even better if it had not continually reorganized the NHS.

McKee writes that his second problem lies in trying to understand what is being proposed:

"The prime minister has reassured us that he will not privatize the NHS. Yet the management of one hospital has just been handed over to what is essentially a private equity consortium."

McKee also tries to figure out the secretary of state's role. Whilst he reads that the secretary of state will no longer have a direct role in the management of the NHS, he sees "ever more examples, from waiting times to refusals to treatments, where he is actively intervening."

His third problem lies in understanding why so much is happening now. Whilst the president in the United States is unable to do anything without the approval of Congress, in the UK, the Health and Social Care Bill is already being implemented, although it has not passed as legislation.

In a concluding statement, McKee writes:

"I realize that my bewilderment may simply be a consequence of my own failure to understand the insights that have been granted to wiser and more learned individuals than myself ... But I'm also hoping that someone, somewhere, among the BMJ's extensive and erudite readership, will be able to help me."

Written by: Petra Rattue

Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our public health section for the latest news on this subject. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Petra Rattue. "UK Government's NHS Reforms - Anyone Understand Them? Professor Asks." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 18 Jan. 2012. Web.
18 Jan. 2012. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Rate this article:
(Hover over the stars then click to rate)

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

No Safe Level Of Alcohol During Pregnancy

Featured Article
Academic Journal
Main Category: Pregnancy / Obstetrics
Also Included In: Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal Drugs;  Pediatrics / Children's Health;  Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 18 Jan 2012 - 2:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

not yet rated4 stars
The authors of a study published online on Tuesday that was designed to overcome the difficulties of obtaining accurate and reliable data in Fetal Alcohol Syndrome research, say their findings reinforce the warning that there is no safe level of alcohol consumption during pregnancy.

The lead author of the study is Haruna Sawada Feldman, a post-doctoral student in the University of California, San Diego pediatrics department, where senior author Christina Chambers, is a professor. The study is published in the journal Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research.

Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) is a spectrum of growth, mental and physical abnormalities that can occur in babies whose mothers drink alcohol during pregnancy.

Physical features of serious FAS include smooth philtrum (no groove between nose and upper lip), thin vermillion border (thin upper lip), short palpebral fissures (abnormally small-set eyes), microcephaly (small head circumference), and growth deficiencies in weight and height.

Feldman said in a statement that they designed the study to overcome two key problems in Fetal Alcohol Syndrome research.

One is that FAS research often relies on what the mothers say about their alcohol consumption. Sourcing data in this way raises questions about inaccuracy due to recall bias and social stigma.

Feldman says they overcame this by collecting data during pregnancy when women were unaware of their pregnancy outcome.

"The data were also collected by trained counseling specialists who had built a rapport with the woman and guaranteed confidentiality while collecting sensitive information," said Feldman.

An added bonus of getting the data in this way was that it included specific details about the stage of pregnancy, dose and pattern of alcohol consumption.

The other difficulty with FAS research is spotting the symptoms in newborns. This requires a careful examination of specific physical features:

"These alcohol-related features are often subtle, and a non-expert examiner may miss or misclassify features, and/or can be biased by subjectivity, especially if he/she suspects or knows about prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE)," said Feldman.

To overcome this second challenge, the study used an expert in dysmorphology, someone trained to look for physical abnormalities, including very subtle ones.

And the expert was exposure blinded, that is they did not know which of the babies they were examining were suspected of having FAS, and further potential bias was reduced because the exams were done in the context of a larger piece of research that was looking at over 70 different variables, of which effects of alcohol was only one.

The data for the study came from 992 women and their single babies in California gathered between 1978 and 2005. It included patterns of drinking and timing of alcohol exposure in relation to selected FAS features.

Patterns of drinking were assessed in terms of drinks per day, number of binge episodes and maximum number of drinks.

Timing of exposure was evaluated for zero to six weeks after conception, six to 12 weeks after conception, and during the first, second, and third trimesters.

The results showed that: Higher prenatal alcohol exposure in every alcohol consumption pattern was significantly linked to an increased risk of the baby being born with reduced birth weight or length, having a smooth philtrum, thin vermillion border or microcephaly.
The most significant links were during the second half of the first trimester.
During this period of gestation, for every increase of one alcoholic drink in the average daily consumption, there was a 25% increase in risk for smooth philtrum, 22% increase in risk for thin vermillion border, 12% for microcephaly, 16% for reduced birth weight, and 18% for reduced birth length.The authors note that the links "were linear, and there was no evidence of a threshold."

"Women should continue to be advised to abstain from alcohol consumption from conception throughout pregnancy," they add.

Feldman said the fact they found no links during the first half of the first trimester between alcohol consumption and FAS signs should not be taken to mean it is safe to drink alcohol during this stage of pregnancy.

Their study only took into account live births and so did not include women who may have miscarried or had stillbirths.

"It is important to know that alcohol-exposed infants who would have exhibited alcohol-related minor malformations might also be more likely to be lost to miscarriage following exposure during the first six-week window," warned Feldman.

"Clinicians should continue to follow the recommendations to encourage women who are planning a pregnancy or have the potential to become pregnant to avoid alcohol, and to advise women who become pregnant to stop alcohol consumption," said Feldman.

"These new findings can also help clinicians quantify the importance of discontinuing alcohol as early as possible."

Written by Catharine Paddock PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our pregnancy / obstetrics section for the latest news on this subject. "Prenatal Alcohol Exposure Patterns and Alcohol-Related Birth Defects and Growth Deficiencies: A Prospective Study Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research"; Haruna Sawada Feldman, Kenneth Lyons Jones, Suzanne Lindsay, Donald Slymen, Hillary Klonoff-Cohen, Kelly Kao, Smriti Rao and Christina Chambers; Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, first published online 17 January 2012; DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01664.x; Link to Abstract.
Additional source: Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research press release via Eurekalert. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Catharine Paddock PhD. "No Safe Level Of Alcohol During Pregnancy." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 18 Jan. 2012. Web.
18 Jan. 2012. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Rate this article:
(Hover over the stars then click to rate)

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Blood Clots After Hip Or Knee Replacement - Study Looks At Prevalence

Editor's Choice
Main Category: Bones / Orthopedics
Also Included In: Blood / Hematology
Article Date: 18 Jan 2012 - 15:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

not yet ratednot yet rated
According to a study in the January 18 issue of JAMA, approximately 1 in every 100 patients undergoing knee replacement surgery, and 1 in every 200 patients undergoing hip replacement surgery who use current preventive medications for venous thromboembolism (VTE; a blood clot that develops within a vein that might become serious), will develop VTE before being discharged from hospital.

In acute care hospitals, a crucial safety issue is postoperative VTE, which includes pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The researchers write:

"Without prophylaxis, VTE (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) is the most frequent surgical adverse event after infections. Large numbers of patients world-wide undergo hip and knee replacement [arthroplasty] procedures annually, and VTE is a widely acknowledged complication. Yet no estimate of symptomatic VTE risk prior to hospital discharge is available from the literature that can be conveyed to patients in the informed consent process. Also, symptomatic VTE after total or partial knee arthroplasty (TPKA) and after total or partial hip arthroplasty (TPHA) are proposed patient safety indicators, but data are lacking."

In order to establish a contemporary literature-based estimate of symptomatic VTE event rates before patients undergoing TPHA or TPKA, who received VTE prophylaxis were discharged from hospital, Jean-Marie Januel, R.N., M.P.H., of the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland, and colleagues reviewed 47 relevant investigations (6 observational, and 41 randomized human trials).

The studies included a total of 44,844 patients (21,369 undergoing TPHA and 23,475 undergoing TPKA). 20 studies included patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, 21 included patients undergoing hip arthroplasty, and 6 studies included both.

The pooled incidence rates for patients undergoing total or partial knee arthroplasty were: 1.09% for symptomatic postoperative VTE0.27% for pulmonary embolismand 0.63% for DVTFor those undergoing total or partial hip arthroplasty the pooled incidence rates were: 0.53% for symptomatic postoperative VTE0.14% for pulmonary embolismand 0.26% for DVTThe researchers write: "In patients undergoing TPKA, the pooled incidence rates of symptomatic postoperative VTE were significantly heterogeneous [dissimilar]; the pooled incidence rates of symptomatic postoperative DVT and pulmonary embolism indicated less heterogeneity. For patients undergoing TPHA, similar heterogeneity was observed for the pooled incidence rates of symptomatic postoperative VTE and DVT.

These pooled rate estimates indicate that, under contemporary prophylactic regimens, approximately 1 in every 100 patients undergoing TPKA, and 1 in every 200 patients undergoing TPHA, will experience a VTE event before hospital discharge.

These estimates are of value to individual patients and clinicians in the consideration of risks and benefits of TPKA and TPHA, as well as to individuals and organizations seeking to evaluate institutional VTE event rates against contemporary benchmarks. Our above-mentioned rate estimates provide these contemporary benchmarks."

In an associated report, John A. Heit, M.D., of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., comments about the accuracy of the estimates in this investigation:

"Of the patients included in their meta-analysis, more than 80 percent were enrolled in randomized clinical trials. The generalizability of the estimated in-hospital VTE rates to all patients undergoing TPHR and TPKR is uncertain.

Because the authors did not have individual patient-level data on the dates of surgery, postoperative VTE events, and death or other loss to follow-up, their VTE rates are not adjusted for differing periods of observation.

Since clinical trials typically mandate some form of leg vein imaging between postoperative days 7 and 10 and patients with identified asymptomatic DVT were usually treated, the study by Januel et al likely underestimated the true rate of symptomatic VTE for the reported mean durations of follow-up (13 days). However, because the current duration of hospitalization for TPHR and TPKR is only 3 to 4 days, the current rates of symptomatic VTE prior to hospital discharge likely are lower than those reported by Januel et al."

Written By Grace Rattue
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our bones / orthopedics section for the latest news on this subject. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Grace Rattue. "Blood Clots After Hip Or Knee Replacement - Study Looks At Prevalence." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 18 Jan. 2012. Web.
18 Jan. 2012. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Rate this article:
(Hover over the stars then click to rate)

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Obesity In Children - Virtually Unchanged In U.S.

Editor's Choice
Main Category: Obesity / Weight Loss / Fitness
Also Included In: Pediatrics / Children's Health
Article Date: 18 Jan 2012 - 15:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

not yet ratednot yet rated
Two investigations being published by JAMA reveal that the prevalence of obesity in the United States has not changed considerably. Approximately 1 in 3 adults and 1 in 6 children and adolescents are obese according to data from 2009-2010. The data also revealed that the prevalence of obesity in certain demographics has increased.

In order to determine obesity rates in the U.S., Katherine M. Flegal, Ph.D., Cynthia L. Ogden, Ph.D., M.R.P., and colleagues with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Md., examined data from the 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Rates of obesity among adults were compared with data from 1999-2008. Obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or greater. The Survey includes the heights and weights of 22,847 adult individuals from a nationally representative sample of the U.S. population in 1999-2008, and 5,926 adult individuals in 2009-2010.

After adjusting for age, the average BMI was 28.7 for men and women in 2009-2010. Overall, the age-adjusted obesity prevalence was 35.7%. The prevalence of obesity among men was 35.5%, while the prevalence of obesity within race/ethnicity groups ranges from 38.8% among non-Hispanic black men to 36.2% among non-Hispanic white men. The researchers found that between 1999-2000 to 2009-2010 there was a considerable increase in obesity for men.

The prevalence of obesity among women was 35.8%, while the prevalence within race/ethnicity groups ranged from 58.5% among non-Hispanic black women to 32.2% among non-Hispanic white women. Overall, the team found no significant increase in the prevalence of obesity among women over the period from 1999 through 2010, although they discovered that for non-Hispanic black women and Mexican American women increases were statistically considerable. For both genders, 2009 to 2010 did not differ considerably from the past 6 years (2003-2008).

Overall, the age-adjusted prevalence of overweight and obesity combined (BMI 25+) was 68.8%, 63.7% among women, and 73.9% among men.The researchers explain:

"Obesity prevalence shows little change over the past 12 years, although the data are consistent with the possibility of slight increases."
In order to determine the prevalence of obesity among children and teens in the U.S. (birth to 19 years of age), the researchers examined NHANES data from 2009-2010, which included a representative sample (n=4,111 [1,376 non-Hispanic white, 792 non-Hispanic black, and 1,660 Hispanic]) with measured heights and weights. Among the measures examined were the prevalence of high weight-for-recumbent length (95th percentile or greater on the growth charts) among children from birth to 2 years old, as well as obesity (BMI 95th percentile or greater of the BMI-for-age growth charts) among those aged 2 to 19 years old. In addition, there were examinations of obesity trends by gender and race/ethnicity, as well as BMI within gender-specific age groups every two years from 1999 to 2010.

The team discovered that 16.9% of the children and adolescents examined aged 2 to 19 years were obese in 2009-2010, and 31.8% were overweight or obese. The prevalence of obesity among females was considerably lower (15.0%) than among males (18.6%). Between 2007-2008 and 2009-2010, the researchers found no difference in obesity prevalence among both genders, although it increased significantly between 1999-2000 and 2009-2010 in male children and teens but not females.

The researchers explain:

"Significant differences in obesity prevalence by race/ethnicity were found. In 2009-2010, 21.2 percent of Hispanic children and adolescent and 24.3 percent on non-Hispanic black children and adolescent were obese compared with 14.0 percent of non-Hispanic white children and adolescents."

In 2009-2010, the team found that the prevalence of high weight-for-recumbent length among children from birth to 2 years was 9.7%, and did not change between 1999-2000 and 2009-2010. When the researchers examined these two time periods together they discovered that Mexican Americans are considerably more likely to have high weight-for-recumbent length than non-Hispanic whites.

Furthermore, they discovered that among males aged 12 to 19 there was a considerable increase in BMI, but not among females or any other age group. The researchers explain: "Many efforts both at the national level and at state and local levels focus on reducing childhood obesity. Yet results from NHANES indicate that the prevalence of childhood obesity in the United States remains unchanged at approximately 17 percent; although increases in obesity prevalence may be occurring among males."

Written By Grace Rattue
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our obesity / weight loss / fitness section for the latest news on this subject. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Grace Rattue. "Obesity In Children - Virtually Unchanged In U.S.." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 18 Jan. 2012. Web.
18 Jan. 2012. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Rate this article:
(Hover over the stars then click to rate)

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here